Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
In this contemporary and competitive era, tertiary practical education out stood than other courses. Some non-experimental subjects such as philosophy and history should not be studied at university by some, besides fees raised by universities and fewer chances to get a high paid job after completion of the study, however other practical knowledge-driven courses have to be compulsory in all universities. I agree that working knowledge of courses would be benefited by quick employment compared to other courses. I would illustrate relevant reasons with examples in the coming paragraph.
At the higher education level, there are some courses in the student's curriculum that are totally based on theories without any practical examples, which lead to lower employment. With time these education facilities have steadily increased their fees with time. These courses have been the least favorite by many people in our modernized society. With the increment of the expenses and development for the new building or buy new equipment for science courses, the university raised its fee structure to cope up with all expenses. There are not many jobs are available for graduates from such courses. The reason is that almost all information about philosophy and history would be available on the internet with the latest news compared to the old version of books.
In addition, practical experience-based courses are most acceptable by every student, as they can get them live experience from the experience and also it would be easier for the learner to understand quicker. Students are benefited from jobs after finishing their studies, cause there are many jobs and vacancies are available in the work market. These jobs are highly paid by the employees as employees have to put hard effort along with their effort to accomplish deadlines and finish project work. In this competitive situation, to get employed with a five-digit salary is only possible by a university education with theoretical and practical knowledge. For the instance, a doctor with hands-on experience would get hired quickly than other professions.
To summarize everything, universities should overview the employment market, and based on those results they can set fees structure and decide courses for their students regardless of considering only money instead of the student's future. Study with practical experiences is the modern way of learning is the best option available for the students no matter what are the fees they are paying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...on level, there are some courses in the students curriculum that are totally based on th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s compared to the old version of books. In addition, practical experience-based ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, in addition, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38734177215 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92465224783 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521518987342 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2289555318 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.176470588 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228433941215 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714687618256 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620724186625 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153322788544 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431110184447 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.