Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, we are able to develop medicines for most of the life-threatening diseases, as a result, human life expectancy has increased and people often believe that in the future we would be able to live 100 to 200 years. Although some would argue that increased lifespan will help people become more satisfied and loved, others think that it will cause an increase in the population of old people and put an extra burden on the natural resources and I agree.
Certainly, people will welcome an increase in their lifespan and families will be delighted to spend extra years with their loved ones. In other words, the future generation will be able to spend more time with their grandparents. In addition, some people also believe that elders are more experienced and they have better capabilities of taking diplomatic decisions. For instance, experienced persons are given priority for the position of a prime minister and so far in the history of independent India, we have not seen any young prime minister.
On the other hand, it is often argued that an increase in life expectancy will put more burden on the earth. that is to say that if the rate of death decreases there will be an increase in the rate at which population is growing. To full the needs of this increased population, more resources will be required. In my opinion, we are already at the point where the earth will not be able to sustain life even if there is a slight percentage of increase in the population of the world. For instance, for centuries life expectancy was 45 to 50 years and the population had managed to grow to 2 billion till the start of the 20th century, but by the 1950s life expectancy grew to 70 years and in just 50 years world population grew up to 7.2 billion. Ever depleting predicament of the earth will not be able to sustain life beyond this point.
In conclusion, increase in the lifespan will bring joys to the families, however, it will increase the population and nature will have to pay the cost. In no time, it will become impossible to produce goods for such a number of people
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ancy will put more burden on the earth. that is to say that if the rate of death dec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion till the start of the 20th century, but by the 1950s life expectancy grew to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68292682927 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62285825645 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474254742547 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2748475621 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15664246974 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643896413809 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322600731354 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108315073843 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294217451827 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.