Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is some scientific evidence showing that eating junk food could be harmful to human's health. A number of people believe that the educational programs can be effective to prevent people from eating junk food. However, this idea is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, the opponents of the educational programs as an efficient approach point that because of some changes which have occurred in lifestyle recently, people tend to eat the fastest types of food. This group indicates that the most important reason is fast-paced life in which people have to work hard all the day so they do not pay enough attention to food's health. Thus, the education system cannot work in this field due to the fact that the lifestyle must be changed.
By contrast, those who support producing educational programs about the risks of overeating junk food cite the various benefits. These range from public information arising to decrease the societies' illnesses rate. If people are warned about the dangers of the overuse of junk food, they will concern about their health. Subsequently, individuals try to prepare the homemade dishes which are healthier than the prepared ones. Examples can be seen in some people who have chosen vegetarianism recently. It is clear that they have realized the key role of the use of vegetables in healthy life via educational programs. In addition, another argument is that when people gain more information about an appropriate nutrition, the societies face serious diseases less.
Overall, it seems obvious that although the fast pace life completely has changed the human's lifestyle, there are some effective ways to make it better. The useful Education is one of the best approaches to warn people in this case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...st pace life completely has changed the humans lifestyle, there are some effective way...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approaches to warn people in this case.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12131147541 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6533403468 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6183334376 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367237725023 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115905977101 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10182761933 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22027962861 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850330682546 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.