Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists.
To what extent do you agree?
Art and Science can be considered as strong pillars of our society. Some individuals admire researchers and technology geeks over people from entertainment field. I completely agree with the aforementioned belief and will discuss my reasons in this essay.
Scientists, everyday face many challenges, while working in different areas of human life. They target to explore each bit from another world, such as methods to defeat cancer and involvement of robotics in medicinal field, to make human life contented and comfortable. For instance, team of researchers and technology experts from ISRO launched more than ten thousand satellites in orbit of Mars which would provide information about weather forecasting and treatment of various ailments. This group of people, moreover, strives to develop devices for us to use on daily basis to make our routine activities smooth such as GPS services.
Another point to consider is that people can entertain themselves by acquiring different hobbies such as painting, gardening and cooking but they do not have option to replace intellect of scientists. Furthermore, according to one survey conducted by university of Minnesota, plastic recycling is the burning issue for humankind and different experts are trying to develop procedures either to reuse the plastic waste or generate another easily degradable material which could make possible to vanish plastic existence. If this happens, it would be the revolutionary change in current problems of the world.
In conclusion, personalities from artistic industry are vital but researchers made the special place in everyone’s thoughts with their novel and innovative work for the welfare of humankind so they deserve recognition accordingly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rial which could make possible to vanish plastic existence. If this happens, it w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02023896974 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685606060606 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4228125692 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765009776068 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278908051533 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292438276742 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0416433204693 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256224127609 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.