The course of human civilization has had a devastating effect on the environment. Now we are facing problems such as – melting of glaciers, depletion of the ozone layer and Climate change to name a few. Environmentalists have been warning the governments and the general public over many years now but with no effect. People still have no regard for the indiscriminate use of coal derived fuels and wastage of water. This could be due to the lack of economical alternatives in the market or a feeling of apathy due to the extremeness of present lifestyle. We must encourage people to take part in the preservation of the environment by introducing safe, effective and economical alternatives and by government regulation.
Many citizens are aware of the environmental concerns from the exhaust from industries and vehicles. The dependence of today’s’ life on coal based fuels is extreme and has been developed over the past centuries. It will be time consuming and expensive to make a system change. Though many environmentally safe alternatives exist they are out of the reach of the common man. For example, battery operated cars are expensive and the networks of charging stations are still developing whereas, petrol and diesel filling stations with facilities are easily available.
People can be encouraged to conserve energy by making the alternatives more accessible to all sections of society. Governments must support by companies developing environmental safe products and technology by offering incentives. Education is also an important factor, as the consumers today are busy and stressed and do not have the time to spend seeking out new products and methods of saving energy.
In conclusion, we must become a more environmentally sound society so that our children will be able to inherit an inhabitable earth. This is our responsibility as parents and caregivers. It is unfortunate that we have neglected this for convenience and greed. Therefore all action must be taken to correct this environmental degradation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ve been warning the governments and the general public over many years now but with no effect....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernatives and by government regulation. Many citizens are aware of the environme...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and expensive to make a system change. Though many environmentally safe alternatives ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...glected this for convenience and greed. Therefore all action must be taken to correct thi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31692307692 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28798278116 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3625859136 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20053322152 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566694702769 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433775897183 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113189563221 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036088033779 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.