Should long term job-seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work to give something back to society?
This essay agrees that Long term-unemployed adults who receive government benefits should also be mandated to do voluntary work to give something back to the community. Firstly, it would be beneficial for the unemployed people are they would gain relevant skills. Secondly, the government will save welfare money in the long run, which can be invested elsewhere.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the long term unemployed should be forced to do charity tasks so that they can return some value to society. However, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that performing charity work might lead to them developing employable skills that they might be lacking in the first place. Being out of work for an extended period can be very detrimental to the confidence of the job seeker. Moreover, their skills might have lost relevance to the job market over time. Voluntary work might give them the chance to sharpen their work skills and gaining lost confidence, thus adding to the quality of the workforce, which benefits society. For example, the MHRD ministry of UK reported that there was an overwhelming 44 percent rise in the morale and skills of the unemployed workforce after implementing the work for the food program.
Another key justification for the fact is that this will result in savings for the authorities in the long run. Many out of work, adults claim unemployment benefits without bothering to look for work actively. If the government directs them to do community tasks, they might feel motivated enough to secure a job. Furthermore, the money saved from the decrease in the number of people claiming out of work perks frees up government resources, which can be invested in other areas of society. Thus, benefitting the society at large. Take, for example, the country of Sweden, which has saved a staggering 44 million pounds after it started work for benefit programs for the out of work adults. The money saved was used to provide free education to orphan children.
In conclusion, the pros of making voluntary work compulsory for job seekers who draw benefits from the authorities are many. The society benefits from accrual in savings from not sustaining these benefits, and the number of workforce increases, Hence the government should make it mandatory for people to work in charities in order to draw unemployment benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09948979592 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68994064327 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6982561733 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.055555556 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345552288901 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114726715494 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988927046985 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233302450545 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703195818153 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.