Should the same laws which prohibit the sale consumption of heroin be applied to tobacco Discuss

Essay topics:

Should the same laws which prohibit the sale & consumption of heroin be applied to tobacco? Discuss?

Tobacco products and heroin both come under the category of habit forming substances. Since a ban is already imposed on heroin, many people might argue that tobacco products should be banned too. However, prohibiting these nicotine substances such as cigarettes might not be a viable option as such drugs can come back in other forms.

The first question to consider is did the prohibition of heroin reduce the cases of drug abuse? Certainly, the answer is a definite no. The reason for this is even if one drug is banned, another drug emerges in the market which makes the entire ban futile. For instance, when the U.S prohibited crystal meth in 2000, other drugs such as cocaine and marijuana became available for drug users. Therefore, imposing a restriction on tobacco is not a viable solution.

On the other hand, encouraging people to adapt a healthy lifestyle would be more beneficial than the former approach. If seminars are conducted in order to make people conscious about the dire consequences of drug abuse, there is a strong possibility that people will acclimatize to healthy living. To illustrate, India celebrates Yoga Day and Heart day to motivate its citizens to stay in shape and refrain themselves from illegal drugs.

To conclude, banning tobacco will only give rise to a new type of drug, therefore, it is better to spread awareness about the drawbacks of such products. Once people realize what is best for their health, they are more likely to choose life rather than slow death.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...re ban futile. For instance, when the U.S prohibited crystal meth in 2000, other ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99209486166 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57763882386 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4349140834 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131587120674 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476111794882 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458184741152 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756436029252 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621527661707 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.