Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth with poorer nations by providing them with things such as food and education?Or is this the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens?
There are different views on this. Some people believe that rich countries should support poor countries and provide them with food and education. But others say it is up to the government of each country.I will state my opinion in the following paragraphs.
However, many countries today have high technology and have made great advances in various sciences. But there are countries that are economically poor and that people in these countries cannot afford.First of all, if developed countries do not want to help poor countries, it will increase the mortality of innocent children and it is far from humanity.Second, when poor countries have no funds for food and education, they are also lagging behind in health. And statistics have shown that most infectious diseases like AIDS are prevalent in these countries. As a result, developed countries will not be immune from the threat of these diseases. So it is in the interest of developed countries to help poor countries.
It is true that poor countries are protected by rich countries. But too much support is to the detriment of poor countries.Firstly, over-support makes the poor in the developed countries permanently dependent. One hundred years ago, such as, England came to India to help the people of India, but eventually India became a British colony.Second, people in poor countries no longer make any effort to improve their country, and all resources in the country are lost. As a result, many people become unemployed.And that makes the process of poverty continue.
In conclusion,I believe that although rich countries have a duty to support poor countries. But the people and governments of poor countries must also step up their efforts for national development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...is up to the government of each country.I will state my opinion in the following ...
^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...people in these countries cannot afford.First of all, if developed countries do not w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...nt children and it is far from humanity.Second, when poor countries have no funds for ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Firstly
...t is to the detriment of poor countries.Firstly, over-support makes the poor in the dev...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...ventually India became a British colony.Second, people in poor countries no longer mak...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 510, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...a result, many people become unemployed.And that makes the process of poverty conti...
^^^
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... of poverty continue. In conclusion,I believe that although rich countries ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23131672598 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99770896507 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526690391459 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3046990132 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714891849051 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320741705445 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504026306566 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687576820506 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514229581568 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.