Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Certain demographics of society believe that beating-up their children is the best way of keeping them disciplined. These people claim that smacking their offsprings will result in getting better control over them. This essay will argue why physically punishing children is completely unacceptable. On the one hand, some parents argue that by spanking their juveniles, they can teach them to behave in a positive manner. They think that this is the only way to tackle their tantrums. They are justifiably worried about their children's future and behavior, which encourages them to use the traditional method of upbringing by smacking them. According to a survey in 2012, more than 70% of American's agreed that it is sometimes necessary to discipline a child with a good, hard spanking. These perceptions of parents bolstered the inappropriate way of raising their children by flogging them.
However, I would argue that spanking children in order to teach them manners is not an appropriate way. Children spanked frequently and severely are at a higher risk for mental problems, ranging from anxiety and depression to alcohol and drug abuse. Furthermore, children whose parents hit them regularly may also develop more distant parent-child relationships later on. There is also robust evidence of an increased incidence of aggression among children who are regularly spanked. Overall, the idea of physically abusing children could potentially lead to a far worse outcome.
In conclusion, this essay argued that parents who smack their children have a flawed understanding of their child's upbringing. In my opinion, I completely disagree with physical violence on children to make them disciplined, love and affection help them to grow and become a better version of themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng children is completely unacceptable. On the one hand, some parents argue that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uveniles, they can teach them to behave in a positive manner. They think that this is the only way t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otentially lead to a far worse outcome. In conclusion, this essa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42086330935 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92842873224 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611510791367 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4647149995 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.466666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131073677447 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476780412486 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246919220002 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958811482202 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00973633089283 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.