Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by some people that to resolve the problems related to traffic and transportation, the populace ought to be motivated to reside in towns instead of the border of cities. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the notion of the statement as this makes cities crowded and polluted.
On the one hand, relocating from the countryside make the cities overcrowded. This is because it increases the cities population which results in a shortage of scarcity of resources to satisfy the need of the individual. This in turns increases the movement to traffic in the city to satisfy their basic needs. For instance, cities like Mumbai and Hyderabad are overcrowded with the movement of migrants from other places in search of a job. Thus, we can conclude that moving from suburbs to cities increases circulation on the road.
Moreover, the movement of individual increase pollution. Owing to the fact that more population means more transportation facilities required which increases the level of pollution in the air. This results in an increase in traffic jams and intensifies the problem of pollution. (Recently, Singapore has launched an industrial project with 100 billion on the outskirts, and providing employment to the people living around to stop their migration to cities). This is why India is currently introducing and developing industries in the countryside to reduce the movement of people. Hence, encouraging people to reside in cities is disadvantageous for traffic in general and public transport in particular.
To conclude, I wholeheartedly disagree with the relocation of people as this will not only make the place crowded but also increase the level of pollution. It is recommended that other modes of public transport like metros should be introduced to solve the issue of traffic flow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...owded. This is because it increases the cities population which results in a shortage ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in general, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21160409556 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99148266547 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9689385979 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233258420166 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759255763903 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567042870108 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148607910561 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335233195119 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.