It is now medically proved that smoking has a lot of negative impacts on human health. It harms the person, who is addicted to it and also to them who stay closer to the smokers while smoking. This essay will discuss the impacts of smoking in public and also support the decision of banning it in public places.
Smoking is a very personal choice to someone. Everyone has the freedom to take the decision for themselves. A person generally smokes to keep them calm and decrease the mental stress, when there is a lot of pressure at workplace. It may have some health impact but helps them for being focused at them work and also do not impact others directly. And likewise, the work, the place of work can may not be fixed for a few people, like sales and marketing employees. Them may not find a public places to smoke when they need to. So, banning smoking in common areas may be a good decision for those types of people.
Whereas, public places should be accessible to everyone and everybody should feel comfortable at any point of time. Even though a person is not smoking directly, but can get effected by passive smoking from other smokers. It can cause immediate health hazards to people dealing with breathing issues like asthma. We are not supposed to create boundaries to someone’s freedom, however, every individual has to be concern about others when they are in public areas. There could be dedicated places for smoking while keeping restrictions on smoking in public places to keep non-smoking people away from the negative impacts.
In conclusion, smoking causes a lot of health problems to the smoker. Moreover, it also affects the people closest to them. Keeping the above points in mind, it is clear that it has more negative impact on positives. Therefore, I strongly stand with the decision of banning smoking from public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...le, like sales and marketing employees. Them may not find a public places to smoke w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, likewise, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80996884735 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48384108248 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520249221184 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4999886472 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2631578947 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8947368421 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320972001471 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102222218551 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740970608488 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215501796051 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415111233921 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.