Social Media has replaced the traditional methods of communicating and people use more and more social media to communicate, and to follow news and events. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advent of internet and mobile phones, the communication has changed dramatically. Earlier people used to keep in touch with each other through letters or landline phones. But, with the advancement in technology letters were replaced by emails, social websites, chatting applications and wired telephones were superseded by mobile phones. Hence, nowadays people are more communicating through social media, and in my opinion the advantages of it has eclipsed its disadvantages.
To embark on, the internet has revolutionized the communication in sundry ways. Firstly, if we compare with letter, email and social websites are much more faster method of communicating. Moreover, we can get instant reactions from the receiver side, where as in case of postal mail, one has to wait long for reply. Apart from communication, social media can also be used for sharing news and events also and the exciting thing is that once a person share a news on such platforms, it spread like a wild fire. Which was not possible in the traditional methods. Therefore, that is people are using more and more social websites like Facebook or Twitter to communicate.
On the flip side, there are some disadvantages too associated with this trend. Since, people are profusely using social media to communicate and share news, they some times share wrong news as they are not authenticated. The repercussion of which can cause high tension in society or even riots. As access to this media is very easy, therefore few antisocial elements join this media to circulate posts regarding hatred in communities and also to execute some criminal activities.
To conclude, though the use of social sites has many negative points but its pros really overshadows them. Above all , it is the most doable way of fast communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...ter, email and social websites are much more faster method of communicating. Moreover, we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...stant reactions from the receiver side, where as in case of postal mail, one has to wait...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...iting thing is that once a person share a news on such platforms, it spread like a wil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... platforms, it spread like a wild fire. Which was not possible in the traditional met...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... pros really overshadows them. Above all , it is the most doable way of fast commu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, apart from, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19795221843 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91712427738 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61433447099 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6799093539 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381681047586 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103632253437 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104190366289 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192134380761 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789334213414 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.