Some believe that it is beneficial to show foreign films while others feel this can have a negative impact on local culture.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a growing debate on whether broadcasting foreign movies has adverse impacts on the development of domestic culture. In my opinion, I strongly support importing movies from different countries since this is a great way to improve local people’s world cultural knowledge. Even though there is a risk of cultural assimilation from watching foreign movies, if countries can moderate the frequency of foreign movies shown on television and at the cinema, this risk can be mitigated effectively.
On the one hand, integrating international content into broadcasting schedules can develop people’s cultural proficiency in the world context. Through watching foreign movies, the world audience can become virtual globetrotters who can visit any country and learn about any culture they want, such as witnessing the glamour of Paris in the masterpiece Les Miserable or immersing in the local Indian life in the Oscar-winner Slumdog Millionaire. If foreign movies were not available, people would lose one of the precious opportunities to enrich their knowledge about world cultures, limiting the development of their cultural proficiency as a whole.
On the other hand, access to international content may cause cultural assimilation to some parts of a community. For example, in Vietnam, many young Korean drama fanatics prefer sporting Korean style clothes and refuse to wear their traditional attires. This assimilation, although may initially happen at a small scale, can proliferate and wreak havoc on the whole local culture, resulting in the loss of cultural identity to some groups of people within this community. Therefore, the fear of culture loss due to watching foreign movies is valid.
Even though foreign movies can pose a threat to the sustainability of local cultures, if countries have well-balanced broadcasting schedules between international and domestic content, this threat can be greatly alleviated. One example is in Canada, at least half of the content on Netflix, the most popular movie-on-demand service in the country, is required by law to be domestically produced. As a result, Canadians have been able to enjoy a large number of foreign movies while successfully preserving their cultural identity. Since the main problem can be addressed, there is no reason countries have to censor outside content, which can further lead to a huge disadvantage in the development of local people's world cultural understanding.
In conclusion, countries should promote foreign movies because of the tremendous benefits of world culture knowledge people can reap and the fact that the risk of cultural assimilation can be significantly reduced. It is hopeful that in the future, there will be more fascinating movies from all countries so that people can learn more about other cultures in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sult, Canadians have been able to enjoy a large number of foreign movies while successfully prese...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48512585812 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06605073735 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510297482838 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0484447047 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8125 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3125 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220747570261 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853031636512 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415956210767 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13907068596 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253009506693 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.