Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
You should write at least 250 words.
More and more companies hire new employees to improve their business structure. These new employers however tend to fall back in basic expertise such as co-op skills. This essay will discuss the possible causes lack of exposure and team work and will suggest solutions like trusting the employers decisions and team building.
The causes for weak cooperative skills in new employers are many such as poor team working quality and lack of exposure by management. This is beacause employers try to prove their point to stand out in this competitive domain and therefore do not get along with team decision making. Sometimes the organisation is to blame because they are unable to spend enough time with their fresh staff to trust their decisions and opinions.A study suggests that organisation tend to rely on staff working with them for a longer time than the ones who join new.
However this can by solved when the new employers show their team working skill and the managers offering them oppurtunities in projects. Team working occurs when communication skill, listening skill and acceptance build up together in a workforce environment. Also managers must involve and offer good exposure to their new staff to boost up their interpersonal skill in a good way. For example, TCS Pvt Ltd allows more and more new employees to take charge of their small scale projects so as to improve their performance.
In conclusion, lack of basic interpersonal skills in new employees are quite common in many companies and business. Thus, this essay discussed the causes of such skills and suggested the possible outcomes so that the new employees can develop these foundational skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...f to trust their decisions and opinions.A study suggests that organisation tend t...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ger time than the ones who join new. However this can by solved when the new employe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...up together in a workforce environment. Also managers must involve and offer good ex...
^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ke charge of their small scale projects so as to improve their performance. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12363636364 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68615304512 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8336431216 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264166908242 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113215834045 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553088333844 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183229993195 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049899839191 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.