In a world of growing populations, solutions have had to be designed in order to accomodate and house these increasing numbers. One approach has been to tackle the issue using the vertical space available while the other has been to use the lateral landscape. I will illustrate why the better solution is to provide housing via taller buildings.
A major benefit of creating homes in a vertical manner is the reduction in materials and more efficient use of the landscape. By building housing upwards it allows for the neighbouring land to be utilised in other ways, as well as less materials needed for buildings such as apartment complexes. Due to the decline of the environment, being as environmentally friendly as possible is an important consideration when designing the future of homes, so as to reduce waste and maximise resources. Although, large buildings do require more material in total, the cost spent per person that can inhabit the space would most likely be much less in comparison to single housing. Not only does building larger buildings become cost efficient but also reduces material waste and emissions.
In addition, with people being more concentrated in a designated area, systems can be better coordinated in order to fulfill their duties with fewer logisitical problems despite a large number of people. For example, health or government services can be better delivered due to a more centralised point for the dissemination of information. In addition, essential business are able to provide to a larger number of people which allows for better business growth and convenience to consumers. Having a large number of people live in a well defined area allows for better organisation and allocation of resources.
In conclusion, the option to produce larger buildings is a more desirable decision because of the reduction in environmental costs that would result as well as the ability to organise more effectively and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a vertical manner" with adverb for "vertical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s. A major benefit of creating homes in a vertical manner is the reduction in materials and more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun materials is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o be utilised in other ways, as well as less materials needed for buildings such as ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ion when designing the future of homes, so as to reduce waste and maximise resources. Al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...with fewer logisitical problems despite a large number of people. For example, health or governme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...th and convenience to consumers. Having a large number of people live in a well defined area allo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22784810127 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00032044435 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3919370233 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226081158668 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797506925919 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729448203531 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119116540389 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617689276991 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.