In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, in other countries, they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules?
In this modern world whether strict rules should be followed by children or not is a very critical and controversial issue. As we know that children are living in different societies and cultures, their behaviour and metal structures are different as well. For example, in Pakistan, more social and loyalty could be observed among children and they respect their parents in a very charming way. While respect is very common, friendly relationship among parents and children are not. On the contrary, in European countries, it is a bit different. In these countries, children have their own motto and they do those types of tasks only which they have set in their minds. However, they have a better and friendly relationship with their parents. So overall strict rules would not be suitable for all geographic locations, which might be helpful in some parts of the world. The strict rules in children behaviour have some advantages but also have some drawbacks which are discussed below.
First of all the children under strict rules and code of conduct will be responsible and very respectful to the parents, elder people and to the society. Such children build a stable and attractive society. The children in such society feel himself a responsible citizen, mature, and know how to treat others in the society in a respectful way. And the society of such children is free of heinous crimes and drug abuses. On the other hand, children who do not follow strict rules of behaviour become rude, selfish and undisciplined. And such children create hurdles in the society which create bad impacts on a society. And for such children, the government also try to develop such a law to demolish such bad elements from the society.
Strict rules for children often have very bad psychological and social problems. It is not unusual that parents who bit their children would be hated and not respected by the children at a later stage. Strict rules hinder the creativity among children and make them under-developed mentally. A friendly relationship between parents and kids is often helpful for a better future generation. Strict rules are temporary but love and respects are long lasting. Hence parents should try to be friendly with kids and try to explain the right from wrongs. In many society children’s rude and unexpected behaviour are rooted to the too much strict regulation they were imposed. Hence, a set if strict rules is not always a better option to nurture kids.
It is concluded from this topic that Children under strict rule behaviour have a good moral character and responsible adults but sometimes this is not a good option and have negative impacts. So I would opine that friendly relationship, some freedom as well as some rigid rules should be combined to nurture the children and for their betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a respectful way" with adverb for "respectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...know how to treat others in the society in a respectful way. And the society of such children is fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...but love and respects are long lasting. Hence parents should try to be friendly with ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun society seems to be countable; consider using: 'many societies'.
Suggestion: many societies
...ry to explain the right from wrongs. In many society children's rude and unexpected beh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 10.4138276553 307% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99576271186 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6759237814 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440677966102 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5283672286 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6923076923 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433980338135 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13342117581 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891791932057 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289947679274 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770121129942 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.