Air pollution, traffic jam, urban sprawling, and gentrification are only part of the problems majors have to face up nowadays. Especially those who run big cities have to struggle with overpopulation, lack of affordable housing, unemployment, and sometimes high crime rates. All factors that, actually, can lead to an explosive situation. To tackle the problem governments plan to relocate industries and business facilities to outside areas at the outskirt of metropolis. The aim of this essay is to weigh the pros and cons of this proposal.
Traditionally reserved for farming, breeding or mining regional areas may be play a pivotal role in solving some prickly problems big cities are experiencing. Governments are showing interest to those areas since they can host industries and businesses and consequently curb down air pollution levels and traffic jam in the cities. Additionally, building new factories and housing in those areas will have a beneficial impact on the local economy as well since companies will be more likely to hire local workforce. Industries need infrastructures like roads, trails, highways in order to run properly. Further businesses such as restaurants, bars, gas stations will also crop up as a direct consequence of this economic development. However, although the positive aspects seem to prevail, other issues should be considered.
Regional and rural areas will loose probably traditional ways of life, jobs, and model businesses. Furthermore, industries are always linked to some sort of pollution, which can have, conversely, a negative impact on the local environment, ensuing air and water pollution. Rivers, creeks, streams, and lakes once rich of life could end up become totally damaged. Gentrification will affect ancient buildings of historic relevance. Without a careful planning, local areas could endure natural disasters.
In conclusion, since it has become evident that mayors running large cities have to crack down on pollution and overpopulation, move industries to regional areas seem to represent a sound solution. It would considerably help metropolis to reduce their pollution levels and, at the same time, boost the economy of outside areas. In spite of this positive aspects, governments should also frame this step thoroughly to avoid detrimental consequences to the local environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...dered. Regional and rural areas will loose probably traditional ways of life, jobs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, conversely, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, sort of, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57103064067 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08079757408 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623955431755 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7036105839 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234411650193 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623783980239 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571482930983 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140208051875 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373384664065 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.