In some countries, older people who retire from work spend the money on themselves (e.g.holiday) rather than save money for their children. Is this a positive or negative development?
In a few countries, Senior citizens who are retired would like to spend money after retirement such as do travelling rather saving for the future generations. I opine that this is a beneficial development because this trend not only teach to seniors to live for themselves but also making their children responsible for their future.
To begin with, if seniors go for holidays on regular basis, then they become healthier because whenever a one go outside and enjoy new culture and environment then a one forget every routine life and only think about the present. For example, a scientific study says that if a person wants to live longer, must travel two times in a year. Moreover, a new place broaden a person’s horizons and give another perspective of life. Likewise, most of the time travelling removes all negative thoughts and rejuvenates one’s mind. Eventually, this becomes the remedy for a longer life.
On the other side, their children also get peace of mind when their parents are travelling because they attain freedom in all other sense either in personal life or professional life because as seniors have travelled and broadened their horizons they never ever try to interfere into their child’s life. Another reason is that children already know that they have to earn by their own. There is no saved money for themselves, hence rather than becoming dependent on parents they commence from zero to earn. Ultimately, the more pressure youngsters has to earn money, the harder they work.
In conclusion, although parents should secure the future of their child, it is more favourable for their kids that they know their responsibility. That is why I believe that this is a positive trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01754385965 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63110171111 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8442053269 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28865899142 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100796536239 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763554180707 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1792230724 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101909604068 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.