In some countries people who visit art galleries are reducing. What are the reasons for this? How can this problem be solved?
In the current scenario, the downfall in the number of people who visit art galleries is the matter of grave concern as it is affecting both the government and society. I shall outline the underlying causes and effective solutions for this problem in this essay.
There are umpteen reasons why people are following this trend. The primary factor is the busy lifestyle. In other words, the individuals are engaged too much in the hustle and bustle of life that they do not have time to go out especially to visit art museums. For example, the reports have revealed the study that in many countries, the majority population is working and living a sedentary lifestyle and they prefer watching mobile phones or television, as they get tired after work.
Furthermore, human beings find it boring to visit these types of places and they do not want to waste their time in somethings they do not have an interest. To illustrate, families prefer visiting places such as theme parks, as the children find it adventurous and exciting.
Another prominent cause of this is the entry fees to visit such places. If humans go there once, they do not find anything new for the next visit, so, there is no point in spending money on something which they have already seen.
It is essential to work out some practical solutions in order to effectively address this issue. One of the ways this can be done is that the government should take initiative in bringing awareness in the general public by promoting the exhibition galleries. For instance, if schools give assignments to the children to bring information about these art centres, they will ask their parents to take them to the exhibitions. In this way, the number of people will elevate.
Another solution could be to bring the changes in boring art centres by blending entertainment with art. For the sake of entertainment, people will start preferring these places, as they will find something new and will tell their relatives about it. In this way, the entry fee will not hurt them and they will spend money happily.
In conclusion, according to the above-mentioned analysis, it is evident that onus lies on the local administration that they will work on the feasible resolutions so that the problem can be resolved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...initiative in bringing awareness in the general public by promoting the exhibition galleries. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the exhibition galleries. For instance, if schools give assignments to the child...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91191709845 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68428789203 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533678756477 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4902903468 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273849344971 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936394529991 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636185485342 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138630494419 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781176849715 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.