As countries develop, people tend to buy more and more cars. Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Due to the change in the lifestyle, people have evolved themselves from two-wheeler to the four-wheeler. Some are of the opinion that it has more benefits and is making their life convenient. In my opinion, purchasing cars can bring more benefits to people and hazardous effects on environment can be mitigated.
To begin with, there are several factors why purchasing cars can be beneficial. Firstly, travelling to different places will become easier when individuals will have their own vehicles instead of utilizing the public transport. It helps in managing their time and is more comfortable. For example, when going on any vacation with family, especially with the young ones, taking stops in between the journey become easier; else this is very cumbersome on the bus.
Another reason is that, these days, there is a plethora of fuel efficient cars available in the market and it becomes economical when commuting on cars at the daily basis, rather, spending a large amount of money on using a taxi service. Sometimes, taxis are not even available in the case of any emergency and the cost also becomes double when one has to hire a cab service regularly. For instance, the cab service providers such as Uber, Ola always surge their prices during the peak hours which are generally the office hours and customers have to pay more than the standard amount.
Despite owning a car provides myriad advantages, there are also multifarious serious consequences on our environment. Currently, almost every household is having at-least one four-wheeler and as a result, the traffic is increasing day-by-day, which is the main source of pollution. The humans do not clean the smoke filters of their vehicles regularly and let the poisonous gases emitted into the sky. To illustrate, in metropolitan cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, the quality of air is deteriorating due to dangerous smoke transmitted from the vehicles.
To conclude, although there are some negatives of the cars, the positives outshine them. As, they are not only the cause of environmental problems, still the human beings can save the natural resources by buying electric cars in place of the ones that run on the fuels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic cars in place of the ones that run on the fuels.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11388888889 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78464567642 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0199425776 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119462864661 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364320863753 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385948681478 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606455233976 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369281178916 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.