In recent years, many small local shops have closed because
customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their
shopping.
Is this a positive or negative development?
In the current scenario, several small shops have been shutting down as there is a preference for the big shopping complexes over them. In my opinion, I agree that this development is positive as it is beneficial to both society and the government.
There are umpteen reasons why individuals do shopping in the large shopping plazas. Primarily, Shopping malls have a fixed price policy in contrast to the small-scale stores where the shopkeepers may sell goods at a much higher price if the customer is not aware of the actual price. Moreover, the malls offer a guarantee on the goods which small shops may not offer in some cases.
Furthermore, there are multiple stores at one place and customers do not have to travel to different places if they have to buy a variety of products. In other words, the malls have a plethora of shops such as clothes, grocery, food joints, and people can have a better shopping experience, as local shops do not provide multiple things in one place. For example, In Chandigarh's Elante mall, people can enjoy shopping and food in one place. If they feel hungry while buying clothes, they can go to food court.
Another point of significance is that the authorities will be benefitted from this approach. Unlike, local stores, the big branded shops do not avoid taxes, as they provide proper bills, including the tax applied to the things the person buy. In addition, if a large number of people go to the shopping center for purchasing things, they will travel by their cars. When they reach there, they have to park their vehicles at the paid parking spots and this will provide a monetary benefit to the city administration.
In conclusion, according to the above-mentioned analysis, it is more advantageous if there are more big shopping complexes than small ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... things the person buy. In addition, if a large number of people go to the shopping center for pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in my opinion, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88636363636 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68748614905 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529220779221 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0633316238 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350360010936 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121177807295 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707060852843 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181795819202 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531369199869 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.