After achieving the pre-graduate studies, pupils of some countries abandon to study for a year. While some pupils cogitate that it is better to acquire some money for higher education. However, another notion begs a differ that type of activities detract students-
Admittedly, continue studies provide more benefits. First and foremost, from the regular pupil's perspective, when we do the study without a long gap, we accomplished our education early than others. Moreover, get a good job and magnify the skill which helps us to fulfill our dreams ahead of time. Furthermore, we are considering the active member of our family and fulfill the necessity of our beloved ones. Due to we get more importance in the family.
On the contrary, a big gap between studies diverts our focus. Most of the pupils engaged in irrelative activities because they feel free themself. So they could waste the whole time.
Some of them can use drugs and become addicted. Although they have time for searching the area of studies which is essential for industries requirement. Another significant argument when pupils engage in earning money then they feel independent and do not want to devote themself to their studies. As the result, average pupils lose time and cannot achieve the desire achievements.
To summarize, although both points of view have their own aspects. So it depends on the man-to-man strategy. So where there is will there is the way. Where regular students prevent the bad habits their long gap of education help the people for managing the finical issues in the form of higher education feeses such as university, tuition, and hostel feeses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...education. However, another notion begs a differ that type of activities detract student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...s. First and foremost, from the regular pupils perspective, when we do the study witho...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... it depends on the man-to-man strategy. So where there is will there is the way. Where r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01824817518 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60471719277 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3478116153 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3888888889 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2222222222 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144980611426 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411304856721 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540633790603 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790892058795 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518316390907 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.