Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
It is true that some companies tend to reach out for their employees constantly, even when the latter wishes to have a day off. In my opinion, despite some merits of this approach in terms of fixing critical situations, the disadvantages with respect to both the staff and the business outweigh those.
Admittedly, in cases when a business faces an emergency situation, the ability to contact an employee, who is temporarily not working may be somewhat beneficial. Daily operations of companies do not always go smoothly and sometimes not having any access to the only employee, who would be able to tackle the issue may have a detrimental effect. Therefore, should the employer wish to insure effectively operating business-processes, they might opt for being in touch with the staff all the time. The majority of Japanese companies, for example, do require their employees to stay in touch even after work.
However, such a violation of personal space can result in an irrecoverable harm not only to the employees, but also to the company in general. In particular, it can be observed that the companies with the highest staff turnover rates are those that respect their employees' work-life balance least. This phenomenon can actually be explained by the fact that the more frequently staff is bothered in their free time, the less enthusiastic they feel about working for the current employer and therefore, the more keen they are on quitting their job. As a result, the employer would be forced to carry additional expenses, such as costs to hire or to train a new joiner.
To conclude, while it may be argued by some that having the staff available during holidays is important for having a well performing business, I believe that such an attitude can have extremely unfavorable outcomes in terms of disappointed workers and financial inefficiency for the business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the disadvantages with respect to both the staff and the business outweigh thos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06774193548 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90535584944 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1327668119 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1818181818 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0909090909 7.06120827912 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294789970869 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100085590301 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530795006603 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166501567303 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154712543542 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.