Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Traditionally, children start learning a foreign language at secondary school. However, it is believed that they should begin this at primary school. This approach has both benefits and drawbacks.
Undoubtedly, pupils are more enthusiastic and energetic in their earlier school ages than in their teenage time. Children tend to be interested in obtaining knowledge so it is easy to teach them a foreign language in a play form. Furthermore, pupils can pick up different languages faster and more productive in primary school because their mother tongue has not been developed completely yet. Besides, being bilingual as a child can help to learn foreign languages easier as an adult. Indeed, foreign language should be included in a primary school curriculum in order to enhance children's development and give them useful skills for the future.
Nevertheless, some people argue that additional subjects in primary school can overload the school schedule and cause harm to children. Not only would language lessons change children's educational load but also they would affect a school's policy and budget. Subjects at primary school usually are held by one teacher for one group. Undoubtedly, some teachers can have limited knowledge of foreign languages. Therefore, schools would hire special teachers for language lessons. Not many schools can afford this. In fact, caused pressure on teachers and young pupils should be taken into account in this case.
In conclusion, foreign language lessons at primary school have numerous advantages and a few serious drawbacks. However, the school's policy and curriculum can be changed to improve children's knowledge and learning abilities. In my opinion, the benefits of this approach overweigh its disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ional load but also they would affect a schools policy and budget. Subjects at primary ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be taken into account in this case. In conclusion, foreign language lessons ...
^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...d a few serious drawbacks. However, the schools policy and curriculum can be changed to...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50740740741 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79380315642 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6759691935 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6111111111 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398927907485 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13527648961 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084555368882 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281217272116 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774981871474 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.