Children are fruit of any society, without whom it will be perished. Learning a second language is of great importance, which should be taken seriously not only by parents but also by educational apparatus; nevertheless, starting time for learning this vital matter is of cosmetic importance. Starting to learn a foreign language earlier than what is conventional in our education system, would be very beneficial as well as harmful. So, I intend to put this controversial issue into comparative perspective in the following essay.
Firstly, children can learn much easier and faster in their younger age, and it is related to infinite mind capacity in little children in comparison to the older ones. As majority of scientists are unanimous, the younger a person is, the better he can grasp new materials. I have recently read an article about this issue which was investigating about the correlation coefficient between brains associated learning skills and the age. The article clearly concluded that there is an undeniable connection within these two indicators. This article gave me the conviction that the fastest way to acquisition a new skill would be the most young age as feasible, which obtaining a language other than your mother tongue is no exception. Although some people believe it could have negative effects as well, because due to their thought, learning two languages at the same time will result in child’s confusion and from there to his language learning process malfunctioning, however, scientists’ researches prove otherwise.
Second benefit is rise from social adoption, that is to say, human beings one of the best, if not the best, periods of cultural acceptance is their earlier part of life, therefore, teaching a new language to a junior student beside his original language, needs an acceptable level of compatibility to have a cultural comprehension of both native and alien languages social features, which a small kid could better manage it rather than older teenage. My own experience is a good case in point. I am a bilingual person accounting for my mother send me to English classes when I was only a toddler. Now, after many years I can realize what a great favor my mother did to me. I would never soak up the English culture, unless I went to English courses in my younger age. Even though a group of people may take issue with is and encounter the notion by saying that this may cause cultural misunderstanding, invading, and worst of all confronting rather than cultural adaptation, but my own experience reveals just the opposite.
On balance, having compared both merits and demerits of this controversial subject; it is clearly depicted that the advantage of instructing second language in primary school outweigh that of in secondary one by a large margin for two major benefits. One is related to the cerebral potentials at younger age and the other is linked to psychological preparation for intake a new culture though a new language. However sight must not be lost that this essay only discusses the tip of iceberg and there is more this subject than meets the eye.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 950, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...and from there to his language learning process malfunctioning, however, scientists&apo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ke a new culture though a new language. However sight must not be lost that this essay ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2614.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 517.0 315.596192385 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05609284333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92325326481 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 176.041082164 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555125725338 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 825.3 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.7207387863 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.578947368 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2105263158 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245593218345 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595902458237 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538647987846 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142587018005 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484952283798 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.