Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It has been always known, that toys are an amazing source for amusement and pleasure for children. Hence, some parents tend to buy plethora of toys for their children to play with. Although, such behavior has several advantages, it has multiple disadvantages as well.
Embarking upon the advantages, from my perspective, many toys aid in providing children with knowledge in a simple and amusing method. For instance, the puzzles that form pictures of various monuments and historical places. Moreover, they have a piece of information or sometimes a small booklet, to describe that monument. Another good example of toys that help in expanding perceptions and improving imagination, is the simple Lego. Furthermore, parents sometimes use the method of buying new toys for their children, as a motivation and some sort of rewarding, to encourage their children to get higher degrees in their school exams.
On the other hand, various disadvantages arise in the form of some deleterious effects on children. As some children start misusing their toys, and playing with it carelessly, leading eventually to breaking it, while having in mind that it is totally OK, as their parents will always buy new ones. Besides, some other children loose the moral of contentment and become always demanding and ask for more and more new toys.
In conclusion, nevertheless, pleasing children with having many toys has many advantages, however, it also has some drawbacks. Therefor, it is the role of the parents to follow a well-balanced approach, when it comes to the rate of buying their children new toys. Moreover, they should monitor the number of toys their children already have.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24814814815 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83503700897 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7570779957 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352068985705 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127315953055 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827793416816 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232411190779 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438431245317 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.