Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?
Evidence suggests that a number of parents provide their offsprings with many playthings. Although there are some drawbacks involved in this trend, the benefits accruing from playing with various playing toys are by no means negligible.
On the plus side, the advantages of possessing many toys are manifold. They simply stimulate many positives in young boys and girls. In fact, being designed for distinct age groups of users, these playing objects lay the groundwork for the development of many valuable attributes. Color recognition, hand-eye coordination, and becoming creative by assembling different pieces of a puzzle are salient illustrations that inevitably will contribute to speeding the child’s acquisition of numbers and the alphabet. Thus, it is a logical step to be taken by parents to buy needed playing objects.
However, the downside cannot be ignored. The most axiomatic argument is concerned with spoiling children. As a matter of fact, it is well-justified that the more our young sons and daughters are given what they want, which in most cases are toys, the more they are prone to be spoiled. As a result, should parents wish to cease their offsprings to be unpleasant, they had better quit showering them with the number of purchased toys. Moreover, growing child’s concentration span may suffer if they are constantly surrounded with too many tempting objects. So that they become unable to focus on any one game for a decent length of time before being distracted.
In conclusion, buying a multitude of toys for children is a moot point as it can be both rewarding and problematic. While these playing objects can be capitalized on to learn and foster a child’s skills, the possession of a large quantity of them is also not without negative consequences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18620689655 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92120868246 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1683061627 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309861279885 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885231703835 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591843340298 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183261722998 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517735475864 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.