Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops. Is this a good or bad thing? Discuss your opinion.
Technology has changed the priorities of people. Many individuals like to stay purchase newly launched hi-tech gadgets. In my opinion, staying updated with upgraded innovations is important but it can cause a lot of issues to the environment.
First, People nowadays are very fond of changing their tech appliances every year. Due to technology improvement and enhancement new upgraded versions are being launched in different devices very frequently. Some people consider it as their social status to keep the trendy new launched phones, laptops and other such gadgets. For instance, one of my friends changed her mobile phone as soon as new iPhone x was launched; Although, she bought her iPhone 8 just a few months back; She did this just to show people that she is the one who bought it on the first place in our friend circle.
Next, Technology is harming our environment majorly. Although, different Tech stuffs are being designed to work properly for a longer period like usually phones work best for 3 years, laptops for almost 10 years and so on. But mostly people use their phones for just a year and then they are of no use and they throw them away. All these scenarios lead to a high amount of unused gadget discarded as garbage even before the are expired. For example, Lithium batteries can work as explosive at a high temperature and aluminium can erode the soil in the land and make it infertile, effecting nature badly.
In conclusion, I would like to say that excessive discard of old gadgets will lead to major environmental issues. So buying new appliances without requirement is not a beneficial decision for the humankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the first place in our friend circle. Next, Technology is harming our environm...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 421, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...gadget discarded as garbage even before the are expired. For example, Lithium batteries...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... beneficial decision for the humankind.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94982078853 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67627954799 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7344135015 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128865931886 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415633910512 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539571337898 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701195203697 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544213866716 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.