Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.
Do you agree or disagree?
Section of the society, believe high-tech gadgets especially cellular phones, have disconnected people with the society and made them unsocial and friendly. This essay, however, disagreed with the statement as it has connected people more irrespective of space and time.
With the inventions of mobile phones and cellular connections, the world has become a global village. It has made possible for a person to keep in touch with their peers, friends and family living in distant places. For instance, earlier times, people used to meet and share their feelings only when they used to meet in some family functions and holidays, however, with the use of mobile they can share things instantly. Hence, help them to remain more connected with each other.
In addition to above, the communication these days has become cheaper. For example, in past, a person has to spend a large amount of money to talk to their far away relatives, which sometimes used to act as a hurdle to connect with people. However, cheap internet plans have made it feasible for them to not only voice call but also do video interactions without bothering about expenses.
Moreover, the advent of social media website like facebook, twitter has also played a great role in order to develop relationships not just with friends and family, but also with the masses. This has revolutionized the world in a way, anyone can express their ideas and feelings on social site, and address some social or current affair issue from anywhere.
In conclusion, there could be many ways to see any inventions. In my opinion, development in technology such as mobile phones have reduced the gaps between people and connect humans more closely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e days has become cheaper. For example, in past, a person has to spend a large amount o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07446808511 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57715556346 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2360805857 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157534807953 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513899091109 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050898348799 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915535479084 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541315477676 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.