Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Section of the society believes that technological advancement has widened the gap between the wealthy and the poor, whereas they are others, who find it as a medium to decrease the status difference between them. This essay is an opinion, that though some discoveries definitely reduced the gap, however, there are other inventions which have make society more polarised.
To begin with, some new technology inventions are accessible to everyone irrespective of their economic status. For instances, the internet the biggest development has made the world a global village because of its availability to everybody at the cheaper rate. Nowadays, both the categories can access the internet and related application such as whatsup, facebook. Moreover, some places like hospitals, railway stations, bus stands and airports are WIFI-hotspot where internet is freely available. Online shopping facilities, e-learning opportunities are available to the rich as well as the poor group of people. Therefore, it can state that such inventions have reduced the distance between the two groups to great extent.
On the contrary, there are certain innovations which have widened the distance. Modern medical treatment, to name one, is very expensive. Only the economical stable group of people can afford to get good medical facilities. Let’s take an example, treatment of cancer. Some rich people can spend money to get treatment with special protein which is very expensive but with fewer side backs. However, a poor patient has to undergo conventional chemotherapy by spending all of their money and yet there is no guarantee that condition will improve. Such instances suggest the gap is increasing day by day.
After analysing both the viewpoints, it can be concluded that different technologies serving society in the different way as some are helping to reduce the gap whereas there are others who are functioning in opposite direction. However, it is hoped that in the future, technology will be a benefit to all people regardless of their financial status.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88647850989 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6898950744 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.823529412 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210941816916 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559951055621 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428320987399 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12395398295 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245009979664 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.