Nowadays, the development of modern technologies has contributed significantly to economic growth and plays a more and more important role in development strategy. However, now the discussion centers on whether the technological innovations are increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. My view is that, in general, modern technology has narrowed that gap.
Firstly, the population that lives under the world poverty line is decreasing thanks to advanced technologies. For example, the hybrid rice technology created by Yuan Longping, a Chinese scientist, is now helping Africans to grow 20% more rice than they used to do. The price of food and other necessities has lowered considerably, which has leads to the significant improvement of poor people’s life standard.
Moreover, modern technologies, especially the ones that are related to the Internet, are providing abundant opportunities for people who want to start their own business. For instance, Jack Ma, now the richest man of China, started his on-line shopping company Alibaba when computers were introduced to China for the first time. A majority of the new faces that have entered the Forbes list have earned their fortune doing business related to the Internet.
However, that is not to say that the developing modern technology is the best solution for the social inequality. It is a fact that most of the advanced technologies are held by Western countries and developing countries still rely heavily on agriculture and their primary industries. Fortunately, third World countries are paying closer attention to technological innovations. For example, Huawei, a giant telecommunication company of China, is now leading the 5G revolution worldwide and making significant contributions to China’s GDP growth.
In summary, modern technology has helped to decrease the poverty and offer young generations more opportunities to make a fortune. Meanwhile, poor countries should also invest more in the technological field, just as the rich ones have done. Only by doing so, we can truly make modern technologies a motor for the economic growth and really manage to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, third, while, for example, for instance, in general, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45747800587 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13083332115 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571847507331 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6350194027 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.3125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142657384511 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538568653953 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624489390773 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856161355788 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569966345642 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.