It is true that the advent of technology has brought tremendous benefits to human life. While technology can narrow the gap between social classes to some extent, I believe that some technological products have set affluent individuals apart from others, as well now discussed.
On the one hand, it is true that technology has transformed our lives and reduced the gap between individuals. The availability of technological products has allowed massive numbers of people to live a comfortable life in almost the same way. For example, today nearly every household has at least a television, a fridge or an air-conditioner, all of which help to increase the overall standard of living and narrow the gap between the haves and the have-nots in society. The spectacular growth of low-cost airlines also means that more people are able to take a flight to the place they want to go to.
Looking the argument in this light, some feel that technology has bridged the gap between the rich and the poor. On the other hand, I side with those who argue that some technology has separated wealthy individuals from poorer ones. Many technological products are prohibitively expensive, and only the rich are able to afford them. Luxury cars and private jets, for instance, have created a shining image for the owners, giving them an aura of confidence when they appear in public. Those who live on a meager income, in contrast, could merely enjoy a frugal life with mediocre but necessary consumer products. The idea of possessing the latest technology in the home might be far-fetched to bourgeois individuals.
In conclusion, although some technological products are produced for the masses, I believe that some others contribute to the difference in lifestyles between rich people and poor ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: WRITING
IELTS BOOKS READING LISTENING WRITING WRITING TASK 1 WRITING TASK 2 SPEAKING SPEA...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...IELTS BOOKS READING LISTENING WRITING WRITING TASK 1 WRITING TASK 2 SPEAKING...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: SPEAKING
...ITING WRITING TASK 1 WRITING TASK 2 SPEAKING SPEAKING PART 1 CUE CARD SAMPLES SPEAKING PART...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...WRITING TASK 1 WRITING TASK 2 SPEAKING SPEAKING PART 1 CUE CARD SAMPLES SPEAK...
^^^
Line 25, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Share Free IELTS Books and get Cambridge It is true that the advent of technology...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, while, apart from, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31165311653 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8269500231 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.379255673 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199455679984 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773448313508 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675980644167 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089476515448 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843598770776 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.