Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, traffic congestion and transport issues are the matter of concern for any nation. Section of society believes the migration of people from outer edge to within the city could be the possible solution. However, I hold an opposite opinion as it will certainly lead to many other problems. This essay will discuss the effects of this trend and highlight some suggestion from my personal viewpoint.
Firstly, let’s discuss the effects of this movement. Most of the urban cities are almost overcrowded and populated, and in case if more people migrate from farmlands to cities the issue will elevate more creating difficulties for people to find accommodation. Moreover, it would lead to more pollution as in this modern era every family expect to have one vehicle at-least. More people indicate the need for more vehicles which further will result in more issues, parking and fuel wastage to name some. Therefore, relocation of rural people does not serve the purpose of solving the issue.
Secondly, working on other causes of poor transportation; like improving facilities of public transport, building proper road plans, avoiding street-repair especially in peak hours. So, that travelling time can be reduced, indicate less consumption of fuel. Since, the society, in general, has become mobile that means people are prepared to commute to work by car, thus, carpooling and cab facility from employer side would eradicate the number of concerns.
To conclude, it won’t be wise decision to promote movement of people from the countryside to reside within the cities. However, certain measures could definitely help in providing a certain amount of relief.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34586466165 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71249394133 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661654135338 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6505707622 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15554343558 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496881558911 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444036630188 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859469858075 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269443666833 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.