It is widely argued by some that the solution to solve the problems arising from heavy traffic and transportation is to compel people to stay in the major cities rather than in suburbs or villages. This may be due to the availability of better public transports facilities and wider roads. In my opinion, I completely disagree as most cities are already overcrowded and hence, facing their own share of transportation problems.
To begin with, firstly public transport is available in remote area but, it is not easily accessible as people have to travel to a bus depot which is centrally located and usually very far. Therefore, a majority of them prefer buying their own or using private vehicles. Secondly, the roads are very narrow since the terrain is uneven to construct wider roads at a stretch. Consequently, resulting in traffic congestion, especially during rush hours. For example, according to a recently documented survey, traveling the same distance in the suburbs takes almost double the time than that in the city. That is why, some school of thought believe that encouraging more and more people to move to the cities will reduce this problem.
On the contrary, most of the metros have already been declared as over crowded and any more manpower will put a drain on their resources. Although public transport is far more developed and there are a number of bridges, different modes of transportation and wider roads, it doesn't seem to ease the congestion. Moreover, many city folks too own fancy vehicles and like to wiz around in them, thus causing traffic jam and increase in pollution. To illustrate, in recent years due to the boom of cheap cars, many metros have witnessed a rise in the number of vehicles purchased. Therefore, once more people are encouraged to live in cities, it will pose a threat on the existing crises.
In conclusion, I definitely adhere that cities have their own challenges and any additional people will cause disruption and give rise to new problems. All areas have their ups and downs and encouraging people to move away is not the best method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s of transportation and wider roads, it doesnt seem to ease the congestion. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94350282486 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71796042707 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5554144962 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248191846503 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747801455692 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792945174632 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158190220695 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773462506307 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.