Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations, while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give the advantages of both and express your own point of view.
The duration and frequency of school holidays have always been a matter of debate. Section of society favour several short holidays, and there are others who consider one extended holiday as better mean. However, I believe the kind of holidays should depend on the complexity of the course and age of the child, as these two factors are crucial for the pupil’s overall growth.
Firstly, there are great benefits of short breaks, as it is the best mean to escape from the pressure of studies. Some children find difficult to cope with regular stress. These short breaks nourish the motivation towards studies and re-energise to focus more on education. Researches also suggest that it is essential to take the mind of some time, to memorise the things in a better way. Moreover, pupils find hard to learn everything with the daily busy schedule, therefore, breaks after a small interval enable children to revise the syllabus side by side instead of doing all in bulk. Hence, multiple holidays means a way to refresh oneself and develop concentration.
On the other hand, long holidays are best to plan foreign trips, as it involves a lot of time to organise as well as settling down after returning. Most of the families in India prefer to travel unexplored destination during summer breaks. Beside this, it allows children to participate in other vocational courses which are not possible in regular breaks. These classes, help them to gain skills, which are indispensable for all-round development. Therefore, one long vacation means enough time to chase other activities.
After analysing both the types of holidays, it can be concluded that whether short or long, holidays play an important role in a child’s life. However, the frequency and tenure should be based on the level of education and developmental stage. Keeping it the same for everyone is just ignoring their psychological needs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10862619808 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70595146678 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8670106001 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0588235294 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166241335106 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455225660976 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331408412516 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942493586053 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02099582313 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.