Bringing in foreign workers to fill positions that domestic workers are unwilling to do can cause problems in the local community and should therefore be stopped. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern era, migrating from one country to another, either to study or work, is not uncommon. Some people opine that employing outsiders in local companies might lead to issues for local people. In this essay, I shall refer to sociological studies - contrary to popular opinion - to strengthen my argument in favor of the benefits of giving jobs to foreign workers.
Admittedly, an abundance of foreigners would cause social problems for the local community. In other words, the customs and beliefs of people from a different culture could be abhorrent for the domestic cultural values of that nation. For example, the increased number of Muslims in India had been a reason for riots because of religious as well as cultural differences. Thus, it is credible that, in some cases, it could proliferate dissonance in a country.
However, predominantly, relocation of the workforce among different countries have certain benefits. One major advantage for almost all the nations and their population is that employment opportunities are not limited because of international businesses. To exemplify, a study by World Career Organisation has shown that due to the migration of workers from one place to another has ameliorated career prospects for the employees. Also, it has proved to be lucrative for employers and domestic markets. Therefore, it is incontrovertible that bringing people from other countries have several merits for the local community.
Having seen the above points, it can be concluded that although migration of employees could sometimes be precarious for the harmony of a nation, it also supplies a vast range of options for employment to individuals. This allows people from across the globe to work in any field of their choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29285714286 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97103871952 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2550553489 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944363578087 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034811629414 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377260770348 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580045586806 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122614763513 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.