With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.
To what extent do you agree?
Due to advances in technology, the human population heavily depends upon machines, which require resources such as petrol, diesel, and gas, to function. Some researchers opine that the rapid use of these resources has implied the need to shift to the unexplored part of the world to cope up with the increased demand. In this essay, I shall refer to environmental as well as geographical effects to strengthen my point of view contrary to the popular opinion.
To begin with, the effects of this development would be detrimental for the environment because the changes in natural habitat would be precarious for the flora and fauna of such areas. This would not only harm the beauty of nature but would also result in the alteration of natural phenomenons. For instance, establishing oil or gas plants in Antarctica for the production of natural resources would pollute the astonishing environment. Moreover, the animals living in that habitat such as penguins and seals would become endangered.
Besides, the overuse of vehicles would proliferate due to the high availability of the fuel, which combusts to form greenhouse gases. These gases affect the climate and stratospheric ozone layer. To exemplify, numerous environmental studies show that the excessive use of petrol, diesel, and other gases produces carbon monoxide and methane, which are indirectly responsible for the depletion of the ozone layer. Furthermore, many diseases arise due to air pollution and climate changes.
Having seen the above points, it can be concluded that the exploration of undiscovered areas would increase the detrimental effects of non-renewable resources on nature. Therefore, from my perspective, more eco-friendly energy resources such as solar energy and wind energy, should be used in the future to prevent the repercussions of opening unexposed areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42906574394 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01216190389 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.20032397 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167973982553 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514246572804 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635919563952 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999510684723 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735775946259 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.