Modern technology is now very common in most work places. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on
technology?
It is an undeniable fact, the technology is used in almost every workspace ranging from schools to multi-national companies. This advancement has altered methods of carrying various jobs. This essay would highlight some of the changes and analyse if it affects our lifestyle negatively.
To begin, the biggest change brought by the introduction of technical devices like laptop, faxes, mobile phones in offices, is in the way of interaction between co-workers. These lead to better collaboration among members as well as clients. Nowadays, employees can connect with others sitting in different branches and avoid miss-communication. Further, different types of computer applications, such as Skype, video conferencing have enhanced the work quality. Moreover, companies can manage and store a large amount of data- information more securely and effectively, therefore, can access it anywhere with a single click.
On the other hand, it has some demerits as well. People become lazy and the sedentary work style results in many health problems. For instance, the majority of multi-national workers complain about cervical and back-pain. As per doctors, it is an effect of long hours sitting in front of computers. The second drawback is its effect on our environment, as all the technical devices are working on the source of energy, which is non-renewable and will extinct one day. Therefore, too much dependency on this would be a threat to the future generation.
To conclude, it could be stated that though technology has created its room everywhere, however, a close check on it would be advisable for a healthier lifestyle and secure future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...arious jobs. This essay would highlight some of the changes and analyse if it affects our l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40540540541 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09877733207 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664092664093 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8913939717 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098152005604 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281949114695 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280428081907 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515769980334 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235873159531 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.