Some people believe children should participate in team sports instead of individual sports. Do you agree or disagree?
Sporting activities have a plethora of benefits for children. Some people thus assert taking part in team sports is more advantageous for students. I, however, disagree with this notion and believe partaking in individual sports teaches children to be independent and more competitive which is by far more beneficial for them.
One aspect which illustrates the benefit of participating in individual sports for children can be identified as independence. If youngsters are encouraged to participate in these sports, there will be no teammate to help them, forcing them to rely on their own skills and competency, which in turn teaches them how to accomplish tasks independently. For instance, a paper published by Arman Kazemi, a world-renowned psychologist, revealed that 79 percent of adolescents who had partaken in individual activities such as swimming, wrestling, and martial arts, are more successful in completing daily tasks by themselves when they grow up. This highlights the positive effect of individual sports in acquiring independence.
Another line of thoughts suggests individual sports help students to be more competitive. Children who play these types of sports have no helping hand to cover their weaknesses, allowing them to identify and develop their weaknesses, which in turn leads them to achieve a higher degree of proficiency. These students thus will be always at the zenith of their performance and competitiveness. Statistics of a study conducted by the Yale University in 2017, for example, acknowledge that an overwhelming majority of school teenagers who play individual sports have a higher competitive morality compared to their peers.
All in all, this essay has clearly shown that participating in individual sports teaches school-age children how to be more competitive and independent, both of which are vital in our era; thus, I completely disagree with the notion that suggests encouraging students to take part in group activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52302631579 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21791743865 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3706796088 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.916666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212391894288 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909429096398 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549150154605 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141810539565 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573367217532 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.