Some people believe that a country becomes more interesting and develops faster when its population includes a mixture of different nationalities and cultures. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether or not cosmopolitan societies develop more rapidly and are in general more interesting has always been a matter of vigorous debates. Some people are in favour, whereas others tend to contradict them. I am inclined to concur with the former, which will be elaborated in this essay.
To begin with, the phenomenon caused for the most part by immigration seems to be conducive to building stronger relationships between countries, which, beyond doubt, bolsters the economies of the countries and, in turn, leads to prosperity and higher living standards. For instance, immigrants graduated from overseas universities inevitably introduce some new approaches or knowledge, which apparently is beneficial for the countries admitting thereof. Furthermore, people of different cultures and religions appear to have numerous topics to discuss or traditions and rites to adopt. As opposed to, for example, sports events, discussing or narrating foreign traditions or lores might be far more intriguing or even thrilling.
On the contrary, some people claim that outlook people of certain nations bear has proved to be rather incompatible with that of other people. This aspect can hardly be deemed interesting nor beneficial for the development of any kind. Another aspect might be that, at times, people tend to segregate into rather enclosed communities basing on nationality. Isolating from the rest of the nation such people do not contribute to the growth of the economies nor they might be considered interesting for the others.
All in all, although different nations and cultures may be seemingly incompatible, I would claim that such benefits as a stronger bond between nations and novelty which such people may bring outweigh it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not cosmopolitan societies develop more rap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in general, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45387453875 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91538137075 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.602446047 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18103925668 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673005993746 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412684508895 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110552853925 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262646751604 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.