Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company, while others believe that young employees are better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Companies normally hire their workforce varying from young to experienced people. Even though there is a heated debate on who brings more value to the company, In my opinion due to rapid technological advancements, it is the youth labor that can update to the present working conditions. In addition, the younger generation can adopt to changing work cultures and meet the deadlines effectively.
To begin with, as the times are changing very fast, it is the youth who can catch up with the latest trends in technology and adapt accordingly. In recent years, it requires swift thinking and enthusiasm to achieve the key deliverable in every sector. For instance, people dealing with information technology needs to understand and update themselves on latest software and tools. In fact, they also need to gain significant knowledge on various other aspects of software life-cycle. As a result, it requires budding individuals to handle these stressful situations.
On contrary, Some key positions in every sector needs to be handled with utmost experience. These kind of roles require proper planning and understanding in vast areas. To illustrate, few life skills like patience, team management which are necessary for pharma and bio-technology companies can be gained eventually through years. So there is always a need for elderly employees in every industry.
In conclusion, even though recruitment companies claim that its necessary to pay and hire elderly workforce for important positions, it is the youth workforce that adds more value to the companies in this competitive era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...In addition, the younger generation can adopt to changing work cultures and meet the dea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...s to be handled with utmost experience. These kind of roles require proper planning and un...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.428 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97283971986 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3012503431 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786718888519 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269056042389 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341570626948 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0458543279658 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155303601836 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.