Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent times, the advancement in digital technology has erased language barriers to an extent, allowing crucial social and commercial communication to happen seamlessly. In my opinion, although the use of the latest technological devices for language translation can be beneficial, we cannot rule out the significance of human translators.
To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that sophisticated automated devices make it easy for people to overcome the problem of language barriers. For instance, there are numerous variety of mobile applications and computer software tools to interpret, translate and transfer the information within no time. This helps people to communicate effectively for social and day to day dealings. For example, every page on the internet has an automatic translate option in most of the world languages where a person can choose to read in his preferred languages. Therefore, they can avoid the need to go to the translators for these minute requirements.
That said, there are limits to how much we can use this automated software for official purposes, especially when it comes to dealing with government and other authorities. After all, those automated tools lack the sensitivity that an experienced translator possesses. To illustrate, All the legal issues are dealt with a lot of stakes involved, where any error can lead to huge financial and legal troubles for all the parties involved. Thus, it is the real human that has an upper hand as it should be error-free for seamless transactions.
In conclusion, while the latest artificial tools and software's are useful for learning and understanding the things where accuracy is not vital, there is a real danger of going wrong in high-end dealings, if we rely only on these tools without using human translators for proper proofreading.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37457044674 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06749493221 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6815909506 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30165820647 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108768421092 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469548497657 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17608549971 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619030136464 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.