Some people believe the elderly said that life was better in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals consider it true when geriatrics said that life in the previous time was better. I, however, discord with this view as I believe though in terms of living style life was better in the past time, but due to communication, contemporary time’s people are enjoying the most.
Lifestyle and affection amongst society were, undoubtedly, way better in past time. Due to less occurrence of technology, people had to perform physically involved activities which were beneficial in terms of motor skills. Agriculture is good paradigm of this where individuals of early days had to perform all the chores manually and kept themselves fit. Also, the prevalent mode of entertainment was interacting with others and playing games together. People did not have computers as well as the internet, for killing their leisure time, hence, they had to indulge with the society. This substantially breed the feeling of uniformity among individuals. In contrast, nowadays owing to technology, everyone not only living sedentary lifestyle but also socializing at home and spending their life in isolation.
I, nevertheless, believe that invention of new ways of communications, be it in the form of transportation or mobile phones and the internet, life of human beings is free from plenty of hassle and jeopardy. In order to talk or meet with kith and kin, it is matter of few clicks either to make a video call or book train, flight or bus to visit them within few hours. In old times, on the other hand, it took several days to convey a message in a letter or reach physically to the concerned ones. It was quite inconvenient for ones to lend helping hands to relatives in their tough times. These days, it became enormously comfortable to provide assistance then and there to other people.
In conclusion, despite the lethargatic life and diminished feeling of fraternity in the society in current time, I think modes of communication had been proved very beneficial for people of modern times to commute.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... of living style life was better in the past time, but due to communication, contemporary...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ociety were, undoubtedly, way better in past time. Due to less occurrence of technology, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07831325301 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93781414037 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9385429385 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190301002488 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580479185215 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728549399461 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123132637466 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101891985552 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.