It is an evitable truth that global companies for aid rely on some celebrities to promote the policies and to seek support. Recent research across the globe shows that there is 50% increase in the publicity when celebrities voice out towards the support of international aid organizations. However, few people think that even though there are disadvantages such as controversial statements by the people, more focus towards the person and false marketing there are some fruitful results following this strategy. We can discuss both views in the below essay.
First of all, arranging celebrities to support the aid organizations worldwide has some major problems. They demand more money despite aiding for a great cause. Additionally, if their marketing is inappropriate to the organization values, it may result in false marketing. Eventually, the organization may end up with huge loss over money, people, morale, reputation which will retard the organization itself. Not only the organization faces bottlenecks but also it loses the core ethics and values aligned to their organization.
On contrary, getting famous personalities for aiding the problems enhances the market value of the organization. For instance, one of the major Non-Government Organization called Peta approaches the problem caused for the Blue cross organization with the help of few notable people in the society. Another key advantage of this approach is obtaining sponsorship for the organization is effortless. As celebrities stand for the organization, it is critically approached in the society and occasionally the news gets displayed in the headlines catalyzing the organization and its purpose.
To elucidate, even though during sometimes celebrities make the problems less important, the advantages of having them to promote the organization outweigh the challenges. In my opinion, the celebrities have to understand thoroughly about the organization and apprehend its purpose. They must be a precursor for seeking attention to the company more than them. It is my hope more celebrities come forward for the promotion of genuine organization to upgrade the status of the organization.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.583081571 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24814583212 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589123867069 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8487810813 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.705882353 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280800866781 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843550326594 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514910646775 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159559734864 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480788943548 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.