Some people believe that government should make investment in building public libraries in every town, while others think it is a waste of money because we have access to information via internet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

With the advent of internet, all the information is easily available on the web in soft form. Various people think that focus should be laid by government on investing in Public libraries in every town so it can be helpful to society. Whereas other set of people think that all the information can be access via internet so investment in libraries is not optimum utilization of money.

To embark with, Public libraries has been an important aspect of our economic infrastructure and an exclusive budget is also passed by the government every year. Penetration of Libraries in towns is a necessity as it will engage people in reading and will also revolutionize their thought process eventually. Various remote towns don't have internet connectivity due to which they are restrained to learn because of lack of resources. Public libraries will help to uplift the destitute section of the society. It is also observed that physical reading of book create a long lasting recall value in the mind. A special committee should be set up in every town to regulate the library and for timely updation of the books.

Any required information is available on the internet in ubiquitous manner. Internet is a economical resource and can be accessed by everyone by paying a reasonable amount of money. Nowadays, people are becoming tech savy and they are more inclined towards browsing the internet on the go. Due to busy life, it becomes tough to read books in libraries wheres while travelling one can easily read an e book on the internet. People believe that, when majority of population relies on internet than investing huge amount on development of Libraries is not of relevance rather that amount can be invested to better use.

To Elucidate, Libraries and internet have there on importance and they are not substitute to each other. Beyond a shadow of doubt, Libraries has been a very helpful resource and it can't be said that investing on Libraries is waste. Rather rational investment can be done by considering rural and urban areas and planning investment according to literacy level of people and availability of other resources.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rocess eventually. Various remote towns dont have internet connectivity due to which...
^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ernet in ubiquitous manner. Internet is a economical resource and can be accessed...
^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: where's
...ecomes tough to read books in libraries wheres while travelling one can easily read an...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...has been a very helpful resource and it cant be said that investing on Libraries is ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...has been a very helpful resource and it cant be said that investing on Libraries is ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...d that investing on Libraries is waste. Rather rational investment can be done by cons...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01123595506 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81140345651 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508426966292 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2768088191 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.941176471 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64705882353 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312781047683 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102346099177 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637502416419 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199780958884 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610276591987 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.