Increasing the price of the petrol is the best way to solving growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective.
Increasing traffic and environmental contamination are the major problems faced by many countries around the globe. Some people think that the best solution to these problems can be by increasing the price of petrol. However, other's think that there are many other measures, such as educating people and installing air quality meters which can be helpful to ameliorate the situation.
There are two major reasons due to which increasing the price of petrol will not be a best solution to curb the pollution. If price of the petrol is increased then it will eventually increase the inflation in the economy and will left the people with less purchasing power. In addition, it will also disturb the overall national income of the economy as petrol is one of essential component in calculation of imports and exports.
Another possible reason is that, people have become accustomed to driving vehicles for work and it is quite difficult for them to overcome this habit. For instance, people always prefer to choose their comfort over price and same will be the case with petrol. Everyone knows that pollution is increasing, but they will still prefer to travel by their own vehicle because they are concerned about their heath and comfort instead of petrol price.
To overcome the growing traffic and pollution issues various measures can be taken by the government. Firstly, government should educate the public about the ill-effects of the pollution on health. Secondly, Air quality meters should be installed on prime location of the city so people can know about the real time air quality. Also, people should be motivated to use car pool and compressed natural gas rather than petrol.
In conclusion, I completely disagree that the best solution to overcome traffic and pollution is to increase price of petrol because it will not result in permanent resolution. Government intervention and public education will be useful method to control this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...reasing the price of petrol will not be a best solution to curb the pollution. If...
^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
Suggestion: leave
...e the inflation in the economy and will left the people with less purchasing power. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63425366165 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5164859857 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.533333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202840974219 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803019367963 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605779714284 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123203681576 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381518646691 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.