Indeed, it becomes moot-point among masses that were to spend more on public welfare or arts as the handful of folks contend that still many issues exist besides arts. I also endorse the same viewpoint as the opponents.
Admittedly, art does not proclaim a critical aspect for the sustainability of humans life yet it would not disappear owing to their possession of experience with the lower taste of esthetic. Moreover, the multitude of art projects is expensive comprising no apparent outcomes which have direct relations with the income of a nation. For instance, many times, regime generally spend on those items of art which could not help even allure tourists such as on sculptures or other iconic possessions.
Moving towards other justifications of opponents of art spending, it also costs more to maintain such sculptures. To epitomize, it is hard to keep a Kohinoor diamond in the British Royal Museum as it costs more for its maintenance. Also, no officials could justify the income from art. Furthermore, ample of issues also exist which require rulers attention like unemployment, illiteracy, female foeticide, population explosion and many more.
Eventually, it can be deduced that supporting other issues is more vital for the government to enhance the quality of life of residents rather than providing more artistic facilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3023255814 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89018779765 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655813953488 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.044765915 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899136950661 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327992147238 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410007931086 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654623589291 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424068689576 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.