Recruitment methods adopted by the hirers plays a pivotal role in placing quality human resources in an organization. Interview is one of such common ways used by the establishments to select new staffs. This essay will discuss in detail the alternative ways to recruit an employee, as well as provide evidence on why I believe Interview is the most appropriate mode to select a potential candidate for a job.
Although interviewing is considered as the classic methodology to recruit a company staff, there are other ways too. Internal transfer is one such possible way. This is an effective strategy not only because it is beneficial to the staff in terms of getting a desired placement, but also advantageous to the department as the hire is already oriented to the company policies and requirements. Other than this, recruiters could conduct written and practical examination to choose a candidate for a job. A good illustration of this the OSCE examination that is commonly conducted in many place across the globe which is conducted as a pre-requirement for medical staff job placement instead of direct interviews. Thus, interview is not the only way to scrutinise preferable job hires.
However, I personally believe that none these can replace the traditional interview method. This is because, these face-to-face interactions give a clarity to the interviewer regarding the interviewee's overall personality apart from their professional background. This means that, the recruiter can understand the various skill of the hire, including language proficiency, communication skill and, expertise knowledge in the field by using range of interviewing technique unlike the other recruitment methods. Hence, I consider interview place a crucial role in appointing quality staffs in a company when compared to the other modes of job recruitment.
In conclusion, even though job interviews has been the most commonly used method since decades, there are others means like internal recruitment and conducting theory or practical examination to hire a new worker in a company. I also reiterate that, these measures cannot replace the classic interviewing technique as it give a complete picture regarding an interviewee's performance and personality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll and, expertise knowledge in the field by using range of interviewing technique...
^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'interviewees'' or 'interviewee's'?
Suggestion: interviewees'; interviewee's
...it give a complete picture regarding an interviewees performance and personality.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, regarding, so, thus, well, apart from, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47277936963 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21882246414 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56446991404 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3440632476 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195554937001 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761908920132 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466038591872 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123751672165 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230043003739 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.