Some people believe that having interviews is the best way to find new employees for a company. Others say that there are better alternative ways to appoint employees. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this cutthroat era one has to oblige company’s protocols in order to be accepted for the designated role. Looking at the broader view major organizations hire candidates based on face to face meets. Nevertheless, with the state-of- art technology companies also appoint and select candidature through online mode. Both ways are effective, however companies must ensure to follow code of conduct while hiring the profiles in either ways.
As per the recent developments in the technological industry, there are subsequent ways to pick niche skill. Firstly, corporations can have an online aptitude test to gauge the analytical mindset. Alongside an English grammar test can also prove the written and oral communication skills. These tests can be taken at home with ease and at the convenience of shortlisted candidate and it can also benefit the firm in the logistics cost. Secondly, virtual mode helps to have online interviews when the candidates are not in the desired location. Additionally, the right skill fitment can also take place over the telephone before inviting the candidates directly to the premises.
Even over the years, with the boom of technology, corporate still have the old mindset to hire candidates with a personal touch. This may not sound convenient, but companies should retrospect the interviewee based on the skills mentioned in the resume. Most of the companies have panel interviews for the candidates to be selected based on the given criteria This method not only helps to understand the intellect quotient of the candidate, despite that the candidates also go through some real life scenarios during face to face screening. Based on the acumen, personal traits and gestures of the aspirant, organizations are able to finalize the required skill that the person brings along.
All in all to sum up in brief, enterprises should use the online platform to segregate the desired fitment and for further process, I believe organizations can have final round set in person before they hand over any offers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, in brief, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24695121951 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84266533514 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9001605649 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117220053501 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388485377945 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295098106822 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071856167547 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027377861478 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.