Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways.
Discuss both the view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, rapidly increasing pollution is an acute topic of discussion for our society. There is an opinion that imposing more taxes on industry sectors of the economy will improve the ecological situation. Meanwhile, there are those who consider that it would be better to implement more effective methods. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and give my own opinion on the matter.
On one hand, it seems like a great idea to raise the tax burden on factories with severe environmental footprint such as fertilizer or other chemical plants, plastics factories, etc. Thus, it hopefully will lead to decline in production and additionally, received tax funds could be used for various cleaning measures of the environment. For example, to allocate finances to production of oil spills removal equipment or litter collecting robots.
Nevertheless, some people assure that there are better ways to tackle the issue. First, the government could oblige factories to use less harmful chemicals in their production, apply high tech cleaning filters for fumes and high-tech closed loop production as well. Consequently, less emission of pollutants will be released into the atmosphere, hydrosphere and soils. In addition, the dumping of toxic waste by factories should be strictly forbidden and bring along a punishment from significant fines till imprisonment of persons in charge of it. It will play a role of a deterrent and reduce the pollutant input from toxic waste.
I
n conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that preventive measures are more important than the later attempts to solve environmental problems. That is why, I support those who consider higher taxes are not able to resolve the issue completely and there are more effective ways to solve it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re are more effective ways to solve it.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25510204082 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8656679585 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5442891 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23736502023 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694562605715 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520496321879 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119130100168 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512860588691 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.